@purity_culture

Direct Link: @purity_culture
Tags: Rhetoric / Defense , Incest advocate / defender

Overview

The following user defended a pedophile. they also consistently exclaim that consensual incest exist, which it doesn't. They frequently rely on the extreme edge case scenario of Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA), where siblings separated at birth reunite as adults, to argue that incest can be 'harmless.' However, using an exceedingly rare anomaly to legitimize incest entirely ignores systemic power dynamics. Even when physical force is absent, familial sexual relationships carry inherent psychological conditioning, deep seated emotional dependencies, and profound power imbalances. These dynamics fundamentally compromise a person's agency, making genuine, un coerced consent impossible. Attempting to reframe incest through extreme exceptions doesn't change the core reality. the dynamic itself is inherently exploitative. Lastly, any SLIGHT talk about this like rape, csa or incest would result in this account (that is quite large might i add) under someones post complaining about how these subjects are fine, despite the fact others are talking about irl csa, rape and incest.

Evidence

defending / using sources from a pedophile.

OP deleted their post, but the original post was about their experience around being an incest victim. However, plenty of people called them out, and of course they didn't delete the post.

All the comments criticized the fact they linked that thread along with other threads of theirs when talking about real life incest.